Back in July, I posted an observation on the possible career choices that Gabe might have available to him based on his then current aptitudes and preferences. Usually, parents have a funny way of projecting typically optimistic predictions onto their children's futures based on their block stacking abilities or some such indicator--I, being the curmudgeon that I am, tried to "keep it real" a bit more and declared that, in all likelihood, Gabe was best suited to be a stunt man or daredevil.
And nothing about his personality has changed that would lead me to think otherwise. However, based on what I saw yesterday, I'm not willing to add one more possible career path that Gabe might follow: Gallagher.
Yes, yes. I know that Gallagher is a person and not a career path. But considering what Gabe was doing, there is really only one thing this skill would qualify him to do--be the next generation's Gallagher.
As I'm sure all of you remember, Gallagher was a prop comic who was popular in the 80s and early 90s. He was famous for the bit that he ended all of his routines with, a faux sales pitch for his wonderful "new" product, the Sledge-o-Matic. He would then bring out a big wooden mallet and proceed to smash everything, covering the first few rows in the crowd with smooshy bits of this and that--most famously, watermelons.
Not surprisingly, Gallagher was my favorite comedian when I was about 12 years old. What wasn't to love? He smashed things! Equally unsurprising is how poorly his routines held up to scrutiny as I grew older. In college, someone gave me a video of one of his stand-ups. I watched it and was not nearly as amused as I was eight or so years earlier.
Anyway, Gallagher more or less disappeared into the ether of irrelevant comics about two decades ago. He still occasionally makes the rounds, appearing at low-end venues (I think he came to our area a couple years back, appearing at a local comedy "shack" where has-beens and probably-never-will-bes come to mildly amuse smallish audiences), but, for the most part, his career is over.
Leaving the field wide open for his comedic successor to step in! I look forward to investing in tarps and large sheets of polyurethane (Holy crap! To make sure I was spelling that right, I did a search for "polyurethane sheets" and the first company that came up is called Gallaghercorp. I didn't see him anywhere on the site, but I hope that he is somehow involved. That would make me feel better about him disappearing into obscurity--knowing that he was still making a living somehow).
Here's the video of Gabe Gallaghering:
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Saturday, November 20, 2010
Plumber's Crack: It's Not Age/Gender/Profession Restricted
Not really much to say about this. Libby snapped a picture of Norah yesterday sporting some rockin' awesome plumber's crack. And, because it's cute when it's an 18 month old wearing it, I'm sharing.
Does it add insult to injury that she's also wearing pink camo? I think yes.
Does it add insult to injury that she's also wearing pink camo? I think yes.Wednesday, November 17, 2010
What Parents of Girls Probably Miss Out On
Having one child of each gender, I am in an excellent position to, time and again, enumerate the differences between the attitudes, personalities, and actions of boys and girls. That isn't to suggest that my word is law, of course. Different children will act and develop differently. There are simply too many variables to take into account, and any or all of them might or might not affect how a child grows up.
For instance, being a stay-at-home DAD, as opposed to a stay-at-home MOM, my just being here all the time might lean our kids in one direction or another in terms of gender identification and gender roles. But even beyond that, my own personality might play a role in how both Gabe and Norah view the masculine and feminine. I am decidedly NOT an alpha male. I am a subtly manipulative, passive-aggressive beta male. Also, I am very sensitive (not in the "in touch with my feminine/inner child" sense but in the "I will cry like a girl if you poke, pinch, or prod me--ESPECIALLY if you prod me" sense). Will this decrease Gabe's chance of developing into an alpha male himself, or will it simply illustrate to his way of thinking that their are alternatives in life?
Libby, on the other hand, is an obvious alpha female (with mildly crazy tendencies--but I suppose that is to be expected from an alpha female). She is the breadwinner and, ultimately--though it pains me to admit--she wears the pants in our family. But, then, she convinced me to wear a dress in our wedding, so this lower-half-clothing generalization based on our family roles doesn't surprise me one bit. Does this mean that Norah will grow up to be an alpha female or will she take her cues from me and grow up as . . . well, whatever I am.
Only time will tell, I suppose, and they are both too young to even have a clear picture of which direction they are heading. Norah, after all, is only now STARTING to show some signs of her own personality. And, while Gabe shows definite signs of leaning towards alpha male predilections, many of his personality traits might also be attributed to him simply being three years old and full of energy.
But, again, as I've pointed out before, our kids definitely show some gender preferences that are "typical" or "expected" for their respective genders. They both gravitate to the typical toys--Gabe has his things that "go" and Norah loves her baby dolls. They are developing physically and cognitively just as one would expect--Gabe developed gross motor skills at an advanced rate and Norah has displayed fine motor control skills that Gabe is only just now addressing, especially where coloring and drawing are concerned.
So, because our kids, no matter how they perceive their parents' roles in the world, are STILL showing typical patterns of boy/girl development, I think it is pretty safe to say that parents of girls will likely miss out on some of the crazy stuff that boys do--and by "miss out," I obviously don't mean to suggest that they are actually MISSING OUT on anything, they simply will not see the same things that parents of boys do.
For instance, without any apparent influence from me or the television (because I keep a pretty close eye on what the kids watch, and Gabe hasn't figured out how to work the remote control yet), Gabe has figured out how to make laser gun noises, line up and "fight" with army men, and create imaginative situations in which a man is eaten by a dinosaur. The last one came complete with his own oddly humorous sound effects. And that was exactly what he was doing this morning. When I got the camera out--as is usually the case--he stopped what he was doing and I had to prompt him to do it again, so his storytelling lost some of its original zeal. But I think you should still get the point.
For instance, being a stay-at-home DAD, as opposed to a stay-at-home MOM, my just being here all the time might lean our kids in one direction or another in terms of gender identification and gender roles. But even beyond that, my own personality might play a role in how both Gabe and Norah view the masculine and feminine. I am decidedly NOT an alpha male. I am a subtly manipulative, passive-aggressive beta male. Also, I am very sensitive (not in the "in touch with my feminine/inner child" sense but in the "I will cry like a girl if you poke, pinch, or prod me--ESPECIALLY if you prod me" sense). Will this decrease Gabe's chance of developing into an alpha male himself, or will it simply illustrate to his way of thinking that their are alternatives in life?
Libby, on the other hand, is an obvious alpha female (with mildly crazy tendencies--but I suppose that is to be expected from an alpha female). She is the breadwinner and, ultimately--though it pains me to admit--she wears the pants in our family. But, then, she convinced me to wear a dress in our wedding, so this lower-half-clothing generalization based on our family roles doesn't surprise me one bit. Does this mean that Norah will grow up to be an alpha female or will she take her cues from me and grow up as . . . well, whatever I am.
Only time will tell, I suppose, and they are both too young to even have a clear picture of which direction they are heading. Norah, after all, is only now STARTING to show some signs of her own personality. And, while Gabe shows definite signs of leaning towards alpha male predilections, many of his personality traits might also be attributed to him simply being three years old and full of energy.
But, again, as I've pointed out before, our kids definitely show some gender preferences that are "typical" or "expected" for their respective genders. They both gravitate to the typical toys--Gabe has his things that "go" and Norah loves her baby dolls. They are developing physically and cognitively just as one would expect--Gabe developed gross motor skills at an advanced rate and Norah has displayed fine motor control skills that Gabe is only just now addressing, especially where coloring and drawing are concerned.
So, because our kids, no matter how they perceive their parents' roles in the world, are STILL showing typical patterns of boy/girl development, I think it is pretty safe to say that parents of girls will likely miss out on some of the crazy stuff that boys do--and by "miss out," I obviously don't mean to suggest that they are actually MISSING OUT on anything, they simply will not see the same things that parents of boys do.
For instance, without any apparent influence from me or the television (because I keep a pretty close eye on what the kids watch, and Gabe hasn't figured out how to work the remote control yet), Gabe has figured out how to make laser gun noises, line up and "fight" with army men, and create imaginative situations in which a man is eaten by a dinosaur. The last one came complete with his own oddly humorous sound effects. And that was exactly what he was doing this morning. When I got the camera out--as is usually the case--he stopped what he was doing and I had to prompt him to do it again, so his storytelling lost some of its original zeal. But I think you should still get the point.
Monday, November 15, 2010
The Student Becomes the Teacher
Over the weekend, Gabe managed to do something that his predecessors failed to do, and I thought it was worth mentioning on here.
When Libby's entire family moved hither and yon, we inherited much of their furniture, including several pieces of bedroom furniture that had somehow managed to survive five children. Please keep in mind that one of these children was James, whom everyone compares Gabe to in terms of energy and raw destructive power.
Among these pieces of furniture was an armoire. Like many armoires, this one consisted of a large cabinet and a series of drawers (actually, that's probably the description of ALL armoires, not just "many," since, without those parts, it would be something else). Libby recalled often using the cabinet, as a child, as a hiding place whenever they played hide and seek--so this was a piece of furniture that saw some action. And I know it existed through much of the kids' childhoods because, inside the door, there is a giant E.T. sticker still plastered to it.
Saturday night, Gabe broke the door off that armoire. He managed to do what five children could not accomplish in two decades. And he's just three years old.
The door. Well, ex-door. Now it is a piece of flat lumber with a door nob in it. And an E.T. sticker on the back.
Now, I wanted everyone to be clear here. He didn't just break the hinges off or pull them from their moorings. Nor did he simply detach the piece of wood that made up the frame of the door on that side from the top and bottom frame pieces. He actually splintered the hinge side frame board, making it all but impossible to fix. Undoubtedly, I will still TRY to fix it, because otherwise we have an armoire without a door, which is a bit unsightly. But I'm not optimistic about my chances.
When Libby's entire family moved hither and yon, we inherited much of their furniture, including several pieces of bedroom furniture that had somehow managed to survive five children. Please keep in mind that one of these children was James, whom everyone compares Gabe to in terms of energy and raw destructive power.
Among these pieces of furniture was an armoire. Like many armoires, this one consisted of a large cabinet and a series of drawers (actually, that's probably the description of ALL armoires, not just "many," since, without those parts, it would be something else). Libby recalled often using the cabinet, as a child, as a hiding place whenever they played hide and seek--so this was a piece of furniture that saw some action. And I know it existed through much of the kids' childhoods because, inside the door, there is a giant E.T. sticker still plastered to it.
Saturday night, Gabe broke the door off that armoire. He managed to do what five children could not accomplish in two decades. And he's just three years old.
The door. Well, ex-door. Now it is a piece of flat lumber with a door nob in it. And an E.T. sticker on the back.
Now, I wanted everyone to be clear here. He didn't just break the hinges off or pull them from their moorings. Nor did he simply detach the piece of wood that made up the frame of the door on that side from the top and bottom frame pieces. He actually splintered the hinge side frame board, making it all but impossible to fix. Undoubtedly, I will still TRY to fix it, because otherwise we have an armoire without a door, which is a bit unsightly. But I'm not optimistic about my chances.How we found out that it was broken was actually a pretty amusing story, and is evidence that Gabe still needs to work on his lying skills if he ever expects to actually get away with anything.
See, we didn't hear anything. There was no loud crash or bang. There was no sound of splintering wood that filtered down from the bedroom. What he was doing, exactly, we have no idea, and he wouldn't fill us in on any of the details. This is how it went down.
Libby and I were sitting downstairs. We hear a few slowly descending steps from the staircase as Gabe made very deliberate progress down the stairs. But we didn't think anything of this. He will often play with his cars on the top stairs, so we often hear him coming down just one or two stairs and then pausing for long periods of time. This time, apparently, he was coming down slowly because he was reluctant to share with us the breaking news.
Then he said, "Daddy, I didn't break the door."
At first I didn't realize this was a cover-up lie and not just some random statement. He often will say things out of the blue that don't seem to make sense--possibly just to remind us that he HASN'T done some destructive act that he COULD have done, or, possibly, we just haven't found all the things he's broken yet.
"That's good, bub," I said. "We don't need any broken doors."
A few moments of silence followed during which we didn't hear him come down anymore stairs or go back up them. Apparently, whatever was on his mind was still unresolved. "Daddy," he eventually said. "You don't get mad because I didn't break the door."
And then I knew something was up. He wouldn't have brought it up a second time if it wasn't relevant. So I went upstairs and I found the door standing up along the wall and the splintered remains still attached and ajar on the armoire.
I sighed, as I often do, and asked, "How did you not break this door?"
"I DIDN'T break the door," he insisted. And I grilled him for another minute or two but couldn't get anymore information out of him than that. I have to assume that he climbed inside the cabinet and started hanging on the door or something. Though, how he managed to break it like that without crashing to the ground--which we would have clearly heard downstairs--is beyond me. Maybe, the fact that we never heard a crash is proof that, in fact, he DIDN'T break the door. Maybe he just opened it and it spontaneous splintered. Maybe the hinge-side frame board had finally had enough of the rest of the door and broke off ties, and Gabe had just been there to catch the door as it came down.
I don't know, but we still have to be moderately impressed with the fact that he has exceeded the previous generation in terms of his destructive capabilities. Because, honestly, there isn't much else that we can be impressed about with this whole affair, and sometimes you just have to cling to what you've got.
See, we didn't hear anything. There was no loud crash or bang. There was no sound of splintering wood that filtered down from the bedroom. What he was doing, exactly, we have no idea, and he wouldn't fill us in on any of the details. This is how it went down.
Libby and I were sitting downstairs. We hear a few slowly descending steps from the staircase as Gabe made very deliberate progress down the stairs. But we didn't think anything of this. He will often play with his cars on the top stairs, so we often hear him coming down just one or two stairs and then pausing for long periods of time. This time, apparently, he was coming down slowly because he was reluctant to share with us the breaking news.
Then he said, "Daddy, I didn't break the door."
At first I didn't realize this was a cover-up lie and not just some random statement. He often will say things out of the blue that don't seem to make sense--possibly just to remind us that he HASN'T done some destructive act that he COULD have done, or, possibly, we just haven't found all the things he's broken yet.
"That's good, bub," I said. "We don't need any broken doors."
A few moments of silence followed during which we didn't hear him come down anymore stairs or go back up them. Apparently, whatever was on his mind was still unresolved. "Daddy," he eventually said. "You don't get mad because I didn't break the door."
And then I knew something was up. He wouldn't have brought it up a second time if it wasn't relevant. So I went upstairs and I found the door standing up along the wall and the splintered remains still attached and ajar on the armoire.
I sighed, as I often do, and asked, "How did you not break this door?"
"I DIDN'T break the door," he insisted. And I grilled him for another minute or two but couldn't get anymore information out of him than that. I have to assume that he climbed inside the cabinet and started hanging on the door or something. Though, how he managed to break it like that without crashing to the ground--which we would have clearly heard downstairs--is beyond me. Maybe, the fact that we never heard a crash is proof that, in fact, he DIDN'T break the door. Maybe he just opened it and it spontaneous splintered. Maybe the hinge-side frame board had finally had enough of the rest of the door and broke off ties, and Gabe had just been there to catch the door as it came down.
I don't know, but we still have to be moderately impressed with the fact that he has exceeded the previous generation in terms of his destructive capabilities. Because, honestly, there isn't much else that we can be impressed about with this whole affair, and sometimes you just have to cling to what you've got.
Thursday, November 11, 2010
That Time of Year Again
Cold season has officially begun. Hurray. Last week we took the annual preventative measure of getting flu shots for everyone--figuring, at the very least, it MIGHT keep everyone in the house from puking ourselves dry at the same time. Sadly, there is no shot available to keep the kids (and us) from picking up pretty much everything else that's floating around. And with Gabe and Libby in contact with lots of other kids and people, we're pretty much guaranteed to get whatever is going around.
About two years ago, I lamented a fact that is often lost on everyone who hasn't raised small children: in essence, it's about as easy to figure out what is wrong with a sick child as it is to discern the ailment a sick pet is suffering from.
Once, when our cat Tsunami was just two years old, we discovered that she loved pumpkin seeds. I'm not sure HOW, exactly, we stumbled onto that knowledge--probably it involved someone in our house (I was living with my brother and two other friends at the time in a rental) being a bit drunk and figuring it sounded like a good idea to offer the cat what we were eating. Anyway, she loved them. For the next day or so, until the seeds ran out, we would drop a few on the floor for her to eat along with us. She snarfed them up happily.
About two days later--after we'd forgotten that we even gave her the seeds--she became quite lethargic (this is saying something, as Tsu is notoriously fat and lazy, so for her to be noticeably moreso was an accomplishment). She spent most of the days lying on my bed. And she was drooling ALL the time, to the point where she completely soaked the foot of my bed. Since I was a mostly unemployed graduate student living off student loans at the time, I opted to wait and see what was going on for a little while.
As it turned out, that was just as well. I'm reasonably sure that, if I'd taken her to the vet for an examination, they would have charged me a couple hundred dollars, given me some antibiotics, and informed me that she was suffering from some sort of virus or other (or they would have run a whole slew of tests, charged me a thousand dollars, and then made up some ailment that I could treat her for--as there would have been zero chance that they would have ACTUALLY figured out what was wrong with her unless they pumped her stomach). It turns out, cats don't digest pumpkin seeds. They just sat in her stomach for three or four days, causing her discomfort and creating drool. I figured this out, after working through three sets of saliva saturated bedding, when she ralphed up ALL of the pumpkin seeds onto the comforter that I had just cleaned. And there they were, ten or twelve undigested pumpkin seeds. She was perfectly fine after that.
That's the thing with pets. They can't TELL you what's wrong, so you have to create a diagnosis based on the symptoms they are displaying. And kids are pretty much the same way.
When Norah, inexplicably, started exploding pooh all over herself and her diaper around her first birthday, after we figured out that it wasn't some virus or other, all we could do was carefully watch her and her diet and try to see if there was some connection (because she wasn't displaying any symptoms of illness besides disgusting and traumatic--for us--splattercraps). After about a week and a half, we established that she has some sort of apple allergy. Since then, we've periodically tried to give her apple products, just to see if she's over it (our friend's child was violently allergic to oats for about a year but then, weirdly, just got over it). So far--as her diapers from these last few days will attest (I gave her an apple fruit bar on Monday)--she hasn't.
Anyway, about two years ago, I thought to myself, "I can't wait until Gabe can talk so he can tell us what's wrong with him and we can fix it more quickly and effectively." As it turns out, this was wishful thinking on my part.
See, despite the fact that Gabe can communicate rather effectively now, he simply lacks the proper frame of reference to be able to self-diagnose. A stomach ache from being sick is different from a stomach ache from being hungry, but he doesn't really know that (that doesn't stop him from using the "upset tummy" excuse whenever he can--usually making the "logical" leap that filling it with candy would make it stop). Stuffed sinuses from a cold might cause a head or jaw ache, but he doesn't know that.
So that's where we are right now. Yesterday, out of the blue, he started crying and saying he was hot and sweaty and that his mouth hurt. He wasn't running a fever and he wasn't sweaty, but who knows what might have been going on in his mouth. Was his filling from last week hurting? Was it sinus pressure? Did he bite his tongue (this one he SHOULD be able to tell us about, but that would also require some kind of longer term memory for self-inflicted trauma, which he really hasn't developed yet)?
Who knows? So, like I did with Tsunami all those years ago, all I can do is watch and wait and hope. And, just as I was doing two years ago, I will continue to long for the day when he can actually tell me what's wrong so that I can make it better. At least I know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that pumpkin seeds aren't the problem this time.
About two years ago, I lamented a fact that is often lost on everyone who hasn't raised small children: in essence, it's about as easy to figure out what is wrong with a sick child as it is to discern the ailment a sick pet is suffering from.
Once, when our cat Tsunami was just two years old, we discovered that she loved pumpkin seeds. I'm not sure HOW, exactly, we stumbled onto that knowledge--probably it involved someone in our house (I was living with my brother and two other friends at the time in a rental) being a bit drunk and figuring it sounded like a good idea to offer the cat what we were eating. Anyway, she loved them. For the next day or so, until the seeds ran out, we would drop a few on the floor for her to eat along with us. She snarfed them up happily.
About two days later--after we'd forgotten that we even gave her the seeds--she became quite lethargic (this is saying something, as Tsu is notoriously fat and lazy, so for her to be noticeably moreso was an accomplishment). She spent most of the days lying on my bed. And she was drooling ALL the time, to the point where she completely soaked the foot of my bed. Since I was a mostly unemployed graduate student living off student loans at the time, I opted to wait and see what was going on for a little while.
As it turned out, that was just as well. I'm reasonably sure that, if I'd taken her to the vet for an examination, they would have charged me a couple hundred dollars, given me some antibiotics, and informed me that she was suffering from some sort of virus or other (or they would have run a whole slew of tests, charged me a thousand dollars, and then made up some ailment that I could treat her for--as there would have been zero chance that they would have ACTUALLY figured out what was wrong with her unless they pumped her stomach). It turns out, cats don't digest pumpkin seeds. They just sat in her stomach for three or four days, causing her discomfort and creating drool. I figured this out, after working through three sets of saliva saturated bedding, when she ralphed up ALL of the pumpkin seeds onto the comforter that I had just cleaned. And there they were, ten or twelve undigested pumpkin seeds. She was perfectly fine after that.
That's the thing with pets. They can't TELL you what's wrong, so you have to create a diagnosis based on the symptoms they are displaying. And kids are pretty much the same way.
When Norah, inexplicably, started exploding pooh all over herself and her diaper around her first birthday, after we figured out that it wasn't some virus or other, all we could do was carefully watch her and her diet and try to see if there was some connection (because she wasn't displaying any symptoms of illness besides disgusting and traumatic--for us--splattercraps). After about a week and a half, we established that she has some sort of apple allergy. Since then, we've periodically tried to give her apple products, just to see if she's over it (our friend's child was violently allergic to oats for about a year but then, weirdly, just got over it). So far--as her diapers from these last few days will attest (I gave her an apple fruit bar on Monday)--she hasn't.
Anyway, about two years ago, I thought to myself, "I can't wait until Gabe can talk so he can tell us what's wrong with him and we can fix it more quickly and effectively." As it turns out, this was wishful thinking on my part.
See, despite the fact that Gabe can communicate rather effectively now, he simply lacks the proper frame of reference to be able to self-diagnose. A stomach ache from being sick is different from a stomach ache from being hungry, but he doesn't really know that (that doesn't stop him from using the "upset tummy" excuse whenever he can--usually making the "logical" leap that filling it with candy would make it stop). Stuffed sinuses from a cold might cause a head or jaw ache, but he doesn't know that.
So that's where we are right now. Yesterday, out of the blue, he started crying and saying he was hot and sweaty and that his mouth hurt. He wasn't running a fever and he wasn't sweaty, but who knows what might have been going on in his mouth. Was his filling from last week hurting? Was it sinus pressure? Did he bite his tongue (this one he SHOULD be able to tell us about, but that would also require some kind of longer term memory for self-inflicted trauma, which he really hasn't developed yet)?
Who knows? So, like I did with Tsunami all those years ago, all I can do is watch and wait and hope. And, just as I was doing two years ago, I will continue to long for the day when he can actually tell me what's wrong so that I can make it better. At least I know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that pumpkin seeds aren't the problem this time.
Monday, November 8, 2010
A Busy Week
For the record, I firmly believe that involving children in ANY adult activity is a bad idea. At least until they are six or seven years old, at least. Anything. But, most specifically--and because it was relevant to our activities over this last weekend--I don't think kids should be involved in weddings.
Yesterday, Gabe had the honor of being ring bearer in Libby's cousin's wedding. All things considered, he did a pretty decent job. He didn't explode, he sort of did what he was told, and he didn't bite, punch, or tackle anyone in the wedding party. Moreover, since he wasn't actually given the ring, he didn't lose that. Really, he did as well as could be expected.
Also, Uncle James (sadly, he's no longer Uncle Jeebes--though, for some strange reason, Gabe spent about half the weekend calling him Jason, or Uncle Jason) was here for the weekend. So that's been fun. We always love the opportunity to share our children (i.e. abandon them) with some friend or family member so we can get a few uninterrupted breaths of non-child air. This kind of inflicting our kids on other people I DO support, if for no other reason than we are offering a vital service to our friends/family who don't have kids yet--we are giving them the opportunity to test the waters a bit, to soak in the good AND the bad.
Oddly, none of our non-parent friends/family have ended up having kids after spending a significant period of time around ours. I wonder why that is.
Anyway, I have a MESS of pictures and videos from the last week to put up. So I might as well get started.
Oh yeah, did I mention that Gabe got his first filling on Thursday, too? His mouth is a mess and is going to require several more fillings--a few rather major ones--here in the next year. He did VERY well, though--and we found out that, when he's stoned on nitrous, he's very laid back and cooperative.
Norah doing what she does best: being adorable.
Norah figuring out the slide. She's still a terrible climber--something we're trying to adapt to since Gabe was climbing up on our dining room chairs by this stage in his development. I think, perhaps, her girth keeps her from being a very successful climber. She just doesn't have the muscle mass to lug her form up onto things yet. But she did love the slide. She spent about a half hour going down it and crunching down into the pile of leaves below (where most of the butt mulch came from, I think).
Norah in her ride. She hasn't figured out how to make it move yet, but she likes to honk the horn.
Uncle James giving Norah a ride.
Gabe officially entered the Army Men phase this weekend. He received a bag of them for his participation in the wedding--which, thankfully, kept him busy during most of the rehearsal. They didn't do QUITE as good a job distracting him before and during the wedding, but one day of entertainment is about what we expect out of a new toy these days.
Uncle James and Gabe.
Gabe and the wedding party. I didn't get to see the wedding. Since I was dealing with Norah, our options were to either let her run around, pestering everyone at the wedding and making terrible noise or sequestering ourselves off in one of the little side rooms where I could shut the door and keep her contained. That's what I did--and I don't think Norah minded missing the wedding all that much.
And, finally, a video of the kids running around at the wedding reception. Well, Gabe was running around and throwing army men. Norah was waddling.
Yesterday, Gabe had the honor of being ring bearer in Libby's cousin's wedding. All things considered, he did a pretty decent job. He didn't explode, he sort of did what he was told, and he didn't bite, punch, or tackle anyone in the wedding party. Moreover, since he wasn't actually given the ring, he didn't lose that. Really, he did as well as could be expected.
Also, Uncle James (sadly, he's no longer Uncle Jeebes--though, for some strange reason, Gabe spent about half the weekend calling him Jason, or Uncle Jason) was here for the weekend. So that's been fun. We always love the opportunity to share our children (i.e. abandon them) with some friend or family member so we can get a few uninterrupted breaths of non-child air. This kind of inflicting our kids on other people I DO support, if for no other reason than we are offering a vital service to our friends/family who don't have kids yet--we are giving them the opportunity to test the waters a bit, to soak in the good AND the bad.
Oddly, none of our non-parent friends/family have ended up having kids after spending a significant period of time around ours. I wonder why that is.
Anyway, I have a MESS of pictures and videos from the last week to put up. So I might as well get started.
Oh yeah, did I mention that Gabe got his first filling on Thursday, too? His mouth is a mess and is going to require several more fillings--a few rather major ones--here in the next year. He did VERY well, though--and we found out that, when he's stoned on nitrous, he's very laid back and cooperative.
Norah doing what she does best: being adorable.The kids playing in the leaves. Norah had been far more entertaining just before I started recording, of course, plopping down purposefully in the leaves and rolling around in them and stuff. After she was done, we had to clean a handful of dried leave mush that had creeped into her diaper out of her butt crack. Fun!
Norah figuring out the slide. She's still a terrible climber--something we're trying to adapt to since Gabe was climbing up on our dining room chairs by this stage in his development. I think, perhaps, her girth keeps her from being a very successful climber. She just doesn't have the muscle mass to lug her form up onto things yet. But she did love the slide. She spent about a half hour going down it and crunching down into the pile of leaves below (where most of the butt mulch came from, I think).
Norah in her ride. She hasn't figured out how to make it move yet, but she likes to honk the horn.Uncle James giving Norah a ride.
Gabe officially entered the Army Men phase this weekend. He received a bag of them for his participation in the wedding--which, thankfully, kept him busy during most of the rehearsal. They didn't do QUITE as good a job distracting him before and during the wedding, but one day of entertainment is about what we expect out of a new toy these days.
Uncle James and Gabe.
Gabe and the wedding party. I didn't get to see the wedding. Since I was dealing with Norah, our options were to either let her run around, pestering everyone at the wedding and making terrible noise or sequestering ourselves off in one of the little side rooms where I could shut the door and keep her contained. That's what I did--and I don't think Norah minded missing the wedding all that much.And, finally, a video of the kids running around at the wedding reception. Well, Gabe was running around and throwing army men. Norah was waddling.
Monday, November 1, 2010
Mystery Solved
Since school started in September, Gabe's teachers have sent out regular blog updates on the various activities and events that are going on in his school. Gabe has been in almost none of the pictures that are included of the teachers and the students as they participate in the activities, and we've always wondered why. After watching the posts for awhile now, I was pretty sure the reason was that they were mostly using pictures from the Mon/Wed/Fri classes (Gabe is Tue/Thur), but now I'm not so sure.
Instead, I think Gabe isn't in any of the pictures because, more than likely, he's off doing something he's not supposed to be doing. And I base this off the evidence of this picture that came with today's update.
In and of itself, it's a kind of hilarious picture. But, man, do I feel sorry for his teachers--from now until forever (and, of course, for Libby and I, as we're the ones who will have to keep harassing him to focus from now until forever).
Instead, I think Gabe isn't in any of the pictures because, more than likely, he's off doing something he's not supposed to be doing. And I base this off the evidence of this picture that came with today's update.
In and of itself, it's a kind of hilarious picture. But, man, do I feel sorry for his teachers--from now until forever (and, of course, for Libby and I, as we're the ones who will have to keep harassing him to focus from now until forever).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)